Thursday, May 13, 2021

Introduction to Hollering Theology

 

Introduction

“You have done really well here. I am so proud of you. What do you plan to do when you graduate?” I say with a beaming smile. “Well, I don’t really have a plan yet, but I was wondering what you might have in mind?” Asked the brilliant student who has just filed for graduation. “How about the Peace Corp or this great opportunity teaching English in Thailand?” “Nah, I would rather stay close to home.” I persist, “There is a great chance for working with Christian Appalachian Project or how about taking that job out in Phelps High School? You know those kids need support as they have a lot of obstacles.” The student sheepishly shares, “I would rather have something a little closer to my parents’ house and I really need to make some money. I love helping people, I am praying about my future, but they do not pay very well and right now I need a job that pays good and keeps me close to home. I need something that will help me do more than just get by. I am not trying to be rich, but I need something where I can get a different car and breathe a little bit.” Although confused, I relented from the pursuit of specific justice-oriented jobs and helped him with an online job posting service. 

This dialogue is one of many I have experienced as a chaplain with students at the University of Pikeville (UPIKE). This student was a devout Christian who was active on campus and graduated with a strong grade point average. Literally my breath was taken when hearing him express the language of survival rather than transformation. I had expected this new college graduate to share how he planned on “changing the world” or “helping those most in need” yet as I continue to listen to other students, I hear stories of getting jobs, making money, and being close to family. These encounters led me to ask how could students immersed in the country’s region of most “need” not be moved by the plight in the same ways that I was moved to action?

            On nearly all fronts, Central Appalachia and especially Eastern Kentucky is home to persons suffering from poor health, less formal education, and disempowering underemployment. Rather than asking the question of the New York Times, “What is the Matter with Eastern Kentucky?”[1] I refuse to blame a people or culture. One thing is for certain, there is more going on than meets the eye therefore I ask more probing questions that are not as simple as clickbait headlines. UPIKE students are thoughtful, engaged, and committed. Most have plowed through many impediments, developed grit and defied the odds to succeed. What is the disconnection from their desires and my expectations for their actions?

The basis for this research project is the notion that various sources of oppression have created the ongoing degradation of Eastern Kentucky and that a liberation theological paradigm can help empower Appalachian students to see themselves as agents of transformation. For this work, Central Appalachia and especially Eastern Kentucky will be explored as the cultural and regional context, in addition to UPIKE. This research accepts that Appalachian culture exists and when contextualized within liberation theology, hereafter referred to as hollering theology, Appalachian students will be empowered to see themselves as change agents in the region. As the overwhelming majority of UPIKE graduates stay in the Central Appalachia region, UPIKE students have a profound opportunity to effect change in the region.

I have noticed a disturbing trend among students at UPIKE. There is a disconnect from religious devotion and community engagement. Is it possible that a view of God uninformed by liberation theology is what blocks these students from actively engaging in their community, being with the poor, and challenging systems of oppression such as the hillbilly stereotype? If so, can insights from hollering theology empower students to interact with their communities while seeing themselves as agents/restorers of a broken world? This project will explore the following research question: Is there a hollering theology and if so, how does the critical teaching of it at UPIKE transform students’ understanding of their obligation to others as an expression of their Christian devotion, their self-identity, and their civic engagement?

Through many times of listening to students and reading their papers in various religion courses, their words and actions provoke many questions related to self-understanding and personal agency. Some of the key questions are as follows:

·         Are students disempowered and oppressed through stereotyping and cultural shaming?

·         Does internalized oppression happen through the pervasive imagery and labeling of the hillbilly?

·         How much should a liberation theologian focus on internalized oppression in the work of empowering Central Appalachia?

·         Does the framework of oppression through stereotyping become essential to the work of hollering theology?

So often when one is experiencing internalized oppression or has a colonized mind the powers and oppressive themes are nearly invisible.[2] One of the key questions coming from face-to-face interviews in this project, came from Dr. Burton Webb, President of UPIKE, as he was addressing issues in Appalachia. He asked, “Why don’t we grow mushrooms in abandoned mines?”[3] In his question I wonder if this is a beautiful push toward human agency or does the question gloss over internalized oppression which blocks creativity and risk taking?

As I hear Dr. Webb’s question, I also feel my own bias oozing out in this project. I started this research project with a clear vision of what liberation theology in Central Appalachia would look like when students engage in the work. My vision was that students would choose the jobs of justice, areas of most need, and consistently be shifting toward areas that they can do the most good. My view of “most good” has the dangerous overlay of a “savior complex.” As much as it pains me to admit, a lot of my work in the region has been fueled by trying to “save” or “civilize” rather than listening, learning, and empowering others for the dreams and goals of their lives. In this project, you will also hear of how I unlearn many of my “savior-like suppositions” and am now growing into a humbler learning posture.

Liberation poet and educator Audre Lorde provides a helpful insight when sharing that revolutionary change is not simply the removal of oppressive forces/dominating circumstances. The key to revolution is removing the deeply rooted seed of the oppressor which has taken hold in the heart/soul.[4] This seed is known as internal colonializing or internal oppression. This reality is often ignored when people are providing an analysis of regional problems and is often ignored in the formation of public policy responses. Social scientific frameworks and Marxist critiques are limited in the insight they can provide. Before one is liberated economically or politically, one must be liberated through a conversion of heart and mind. Before one is liberated economically or politically, one must be liberated through a conversion of the heart and mind. Conversion, therefore, plays an essential part in the liberation story.[5] 

This research accepts the truth that Appalachian people have been internally colonized and therefore I am stirred to turn to liberation theology to ask questions as I develop hollering theology: This research starts with the following questions:

·         How does one “take the poor off the cross”[6] in Eastern Kentucky?

·         Who are the poor and suffering of Central Appalachia?

·         What are the systems of oppression and who/what holds the power?

·         Where is God working against the systems of oppression?

·         Where and what are the false gods/idols of death?

·         Who are the local players seeking grassroots change at the systems level?

·         What is the role of UPIKE, as positioned in Central Appalachia, to work toward liberation and can a religion course empower critical awakening?

 

In the midst of these critical questions, another question arises. Why the use of the word hollering for the contextualized liberation paradigm in Central Appalachia? Although the word is spelled “hollow” in most parts of Central Appalachia, it is pronounced “holler,” if you travel or live in Eastern Kentucky, will spend a lot of time up a “holler.” A holler is a small valley between mountains and are usually narrow at times accompanied by a parallel creek, leading up a winding road that has only one way and out. When a person refers to a holler as “hollow,” it is an instant giveaway that they are an outsider. Some people said that the term comes from the reality of family-based hollows and how people “holler” back in forth to communicate. Nationally hollers have been a place of media sensationalism and the Smithsonian has used the term “holler dwellers”[7] to discuss people who live in these areas. Hollers became famous when Loretta Lynn sang about growing up on “Butcher Holler” in her iconic song, “Coal Miner’s Daughter.”[8] Holler is an affectionate and localized word that is multilayered in its meaning. It depicts home, family, a windy journey, mountains, and something that might only be appreciated by those who live there. It also represents a passionate and loud volume which gets your attention. In the hollow, one can feel God’s embrace.[9]

As a proud hillbilly, the work of liberation in Central Appalachia is something to holler about because there is much up the holler that the theological world needs to know. Hollering is an appropriate and natural contextualizing word for this liberation theological endeavor. This work is an attempt to contextualize liberation theology in Central Appalachia while partnering this “hollering” theology with critical pedagogy in the classroom at UPIKE. The goal is to empower Appalachian students to name and claim hollering theology as a method of doing theology in their hollers.

This project is one of many projects seeking to support and empower the Central Appalachian region. Although there are many projects in the region, not all liberation attempts are as mindful of producing regional benefit. The attempt at constructing a hollering theology is an experiment in listening to students while providing engaging and critical materials for students to wrestle with while they are enrolled in two different religion classes at UPIKE. On the scale of projects in the region, this project is a minor experiment and theological in grounding. Other attempts at liberation in the region have been much more expansive and at times problematic.

Economic and material development pathways to liberation are the most frequent avenues people/agencies use in Central Appalachia. In liberation theology economics is a healthy starting place as this theology advocates for the God who shows a “preferential option for the poor.” The first major government liberation endeavor in Central Appalachia was through the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC), which was birthed to investigate and explore opportunities to socially uplift the poor of Appalachia. Underlying the ARC mission is the government’s concept of the “Appalachian problem.” It saw Appalachia as a region strangely apart both geographically and statistically. The commission initially sought to introduce Appalachia and its people into a fully active membership in the American society.[10] This economic focus, without a nuanced appreciation of the oppressing systems at play, has become a faulty foundation of which some help has caused harm.

While the ARC was being launched, President Lyndon Johnson, with one photo opportunity (see appendix one), cemented a picture of Appalachia as a land of despair and poverty in the minds of the American psyche. In this fateful moment, President Johnson chose Martin County, Kentucky and resident, Tom Fletcher, a 38-year-old unemployed father of eight, to show the nation what the downturn in coal mining had done to the Appalachian people.[11] He sought to declare “war on poverty” and make the war personal. Tragically this moment ruined Tom Fletcher’s life and years later, when Tom was asked why he was unable to get away from the visible poverty that made him the face of the War on Poverty, he said, “I don’t know.” [12] As this story goes, so does the poverty in Appalachia.

Although billions have been poured into the region to help the poor hillbilly, circumstances have changed very little. Nearly 60 years later and the Fletcher cabin stands but now more dilapidated while Martin County has a poverty rate at 35 %, which makes it one of the poorest in the nation. Sadly, only 9 % of adults have college degrees and unemployment rates are twice the national average.[13] Since the War on Poverty launched in 1964, poverty rates in Central Appalachia remain at the top of the nation. Nearly 33 % of young adults ages 18 to 24 were in poverty in rural Appalachia in 2014-2018 as seen in appendix two.[14] Government programs and projects alone have not been able to liberate the region.

Where economic development has failed, education seeks to offer an alternative liberation. In the midst of the famous Hatfield/McCoy feud, institutions like UPIKE were founded with the aim of providing a quality basic education to those in need. UPIKE’s catalyst of birth was Rev. David Blythe who believed that “while giving them a course in English, he was also giving them a sample of religion.”[15] People like Rev. Blythe believed that what Appalachia needed was education and through education the region would flourish. Historically however, education has also meant educating the “uncivilized” hillbilly. Sadly, this type of education has been a key strategy for outsiders. In Eastern Kentucky about half of the people have finished high school and 25 % have attended college in comparison to national averages of 50 %. Comparatively, only 10% of people in Eastern Kentucky have earned a college degree.[16] Dr. Michael Hendryx with the Central Appalachia Prosperity Project argues that education alone cannot solve the problem. Without training, skills, and then the job opportunities, Appalachia will not be able to sustain any development in the twenty-first century.[17] Education without economic improvement opportunities and education without the awareness of how class and income disparities impact the receiving and valuing of education becomes an exercise in futility. Education does not solve poverty alone. Without this awareness, school becomes a mirage at best and possibly dishonest at worst if one does not admit that it has a responsibility to expand their offerings, as a way of preparing students to work against an unfair reality. If schools do not do this, then it sets students up for a crushing reality check.[18]

Without a formal education, hillbillies will be relegated to the back of the national line yet education must include skills and a broad-based focus that is regionally and economically appropriate. Currently in the US, there is a great chasm between those who have degrees and those who do not and “this divide perpetuates a ‘tyranny of merit’ for the educated, and a ‘politics of humiliation’ for the uneducated.”[19] Educational disparities are vast in Central Appalachia, yet attempts at liberation education must be regionally appropriate and guided by local voices.

For many, the problems of Central Appalachia are not rooted in material or educational realities but are symptoms of spiritual problems. These spiritual gaps are filled by passionate missionaries who have flooded the hills with hope and zeal. Without the work of missionaries, Pikeville Kentucky would not have UPIKE or Pikeville Medical Center as both were founded by Christian missionaries (PCUSA, UMC). Yet these breakthroughs did not come without any baggage. In addition to education and health care, some missionaries brought with them the desire to transform a culture into an image of their own imperial making. Dr. Jill Fraley, professor of law at Washington and Lee Law School, explores this through the lens of moral geography. With ideas about the wilderness, some missionaries felt passion to reach to the far regions of the mountains. They overlaid their ideas of nature onto the people by dividing the Appalachian people from the rest of the nation.[20] This type of missionary came to “fix” and “save” a broken people. Dr. Dwight Billings, an Appalachian scholar and professor of sociology, summarizes this notion, “Missionaries, intent on improving conditions in isolated mountain areas, also perpetuated the stereotype by focusing on the poorest images in the region and exploiting those images as a call to action for assistance in funding and resources.”[21] Missionaries in their zeal can also perpetuate the demeaning of the hillbilly and his/her culture.

Unlike some missionaries who imported a view of civilization on hillbillies, the greatest threat to Central Appalachian liberation is a danger from within. Escapist spirituality is a view of Christianity that sees escaping the earth and its painful reality as the goal of the Christian faith. In this expression of faith, the aim is escaping the pains and chaos of earth for the otherworldly paradise of heaven.[22]  This is not a spirituality centered on grace and liberation. A grace-centered spirituality seeks to set people free from suffering by working toward the earthly relieving of bodily suffering. It is through an embodied faith that one is emboldened to challenge the death dealings systems.[23] Escapist faith can be seen in popular hymns such as “On Jordan’s Stormy Banks[24] and “I’ll Fly Away[25] which are regularly sung in the hollers of Central Appalachia.

Escapism does damage to long-term discipleship and makes the critique of the oppressive powers anemic. Although escapism has its limitations, it can provide a way of subversion and temporary relief from oppression. Dr. Harry Lefever, professor of sociology, offers humbling insight as he argues that escapist religion can provide the oppressed and poor “spiritual compensation” for all of the material suffering. Although having no status or power on earth, the poor/oppressed will be given eternal bliss in heaven.[26] Evaluating escapist spirituality demands theological humility and honesty. There is a rich humility in knowing that poverty and suffering may be one’s lived reality and the American Dream is a myth, particularly for those in Central Appalachia. For many in the region, the promise of social advancement has proven to be a mirage.[27] Escapist spirituality provides some solace in the wake of this mirage. However, despite the benefits and solace it affords, it has left behind so many hillbillies in the areas of education, job creation, and sustained economic progress. Escapism has fueled many hillbillies to look past the undersides of capitalistic profiting off of their land/people, because Heaven is their home thus nullifying the need to change earthly realities.

Heaven is a beautiful hope and promise for the believer, yet hillbillies also love the earth and the gift of the mountains. Hillbillies love their homeplace and hollers, so then, this project will seek to provide a contextualized liberation theology that empowers hillbillies to live in a way that operates “on earth as it is in heaven.” Hollering theology provides an alternative vision for liberation that provides a contextualized liberation theology which will be implemented in religion classes at UPIKE for the aim of critically awakening a generation of Appalachian leaders/change agents.

Chapter one will discuss the key concepts of colonization of the mind and internalized oppression as a diagnosis for a key avenue of oppression in Central Appalachia. Also, this chapter will explore the origins of the Appalachian hillbilly and how this stereotype is sinisterly used to oppress Central Appalachia resulting in the deadly fruits of addiction, disempowerment, justification of the ransacking of the region’s resources, land, and people.

Chapter two will take a closer look at the scholastic underpinnings of the project by examining the works of liberation thinkers Leonardo Boff and Ignacio Ellacuria. Special attention will be given to Ellacuria’s idea of the Christian university. In addition, Dalit theology will be explored for the ways in which it speaks to the notion of inherent shaming of people. Ultimately the chapter will provide the theological rationale for the creation of hollering theology.

Chapter three will dive deeper into the culture of Central Appalachia by dialoguing with Appalachian scholar Loyal Jones and Appalachian provocateur JD Vance in addition to scholars in the field of Appalachian studies. Further, the context of UPIKE and its spiritual life will be addressed in detail. This contextual framing leads to discussing more fully the problems that are addressed by this study and the change sought.  

Chapter four will frame this study within the higher education setting and therefore discuss the educational philosophy of critical pedagogy and key scholars within this movement such as Paulo Freire and Myles Horton. Critical pedagogy is the method of teaching for the classes in which the project is set. Later in the chapter the courses of Introduction to the New Testament and Appalachian Liberation Theology are discussed whereas you will learn the inner dynamics of specific assignments and course philosophy for the classes.

Chapter five will plumb the depths of the project and show the results of the research. Special attention will be given to survey results in addition to the results of student writing reflections and interviews. Also, the development of hollering theology is addressed and will be related to other liberation projects. Finally, the chapter will share the evaluation of the project and give concluding interpretation of the results of the project.

Chapter six is the heart of the project as it shares the pastoral method of Leonardo Boff which is used in this work and then applies it in the creation of hollering theology. UPIKE and Appalachian leader Paul Patton will be provided as models for hollering liberationists who are acting out this contextualized theology. Throughout the chapter, readers will learn the key theological framework of hollering theology, such as terms, images, and how this theology presents a hillbilly Jesus and a family metaphor for the Trinity. The contextualization of Jesus and the Trinity will be explored as ways to better introduce liberation theology to Appalachian students.

Chapter seven will explore the implications and value of this project by seeing it as an agent for social change. In addition, this chapter looks at the potential of using hollering theology in other works and how this study can be further expanded. Finally, the chapter serves as a conclusion to the thesis.




[2] Mukoma Wa Ngugi, “What Decolonizing the Mind Means Today: The Work of Linguistic Decolonization Cannot Be Done By Writers Alone," Literary Hub, March 23, 2018, accessed 5-13-2020,

https://lithub.com/mukoma-wa-ngugi-what-decolonizing-the-mind-means-today/

 

[3] Burton Webb, interviewed by author, Pikeville, KY,  June 21, 2020.

[4] Alvaro Basista Alcaza, "The Curriculum Implications of Liberation Theology as a Theory for Social Change," (2001), LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses, 233. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/233 151

 

 

[6] Jon Sobrino, The Principle of Mercy, Orbis, 2004, 3.

 

[9] Catholic Bishops of Appalachia. At Home in the Web of Life. 1995. 54.  

[10] Andrew Isserman, “Socioeconomic Review of Appalachia Then and Now: An Update of the "Realities of Deprivation" Reported to the President in 1964,” Appalachian Regional Commission, 1996, Accessed July 17, 2020, https://www.arc.gov/report/socioeconomic-review-of-appalachia-then-and-now-an-update-of-the-realities-of-deprivation-reported-to-the-president-in-1964/

[11] Allen G. Breed, ‘Poster Father’ Weary of Sour Fate: Kentucky: Tom Fletcher still lives in the hillside house where Lyndon Johnson visited. He voices resentment over media interest in his life story, in which most luck has been bad,” June 26, 1994,  LA Times, Accessed July 30, 2020, https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-06-26-mn-8651-story.html  

 

[12]Ibid.

 

[13] Pam Fessler, “Poverty in Appalachia today: Kentucky County That Gave War on Poverty A Face Still Struggles,” January 8, 2014, National Public Radio, Accessed August 4, 2020,

https://www.npr.org/2014/01/08/260151923/kentucky-county-that-gave-war-on-poverty-a-face-still-struggles

[14] Kelvin Pollard and Linda A. Jacobsen, “The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey Chartbook,” Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020, Accessed July 21, 2020, https://www.prb.org/appalachias-current-strengths-and-vulnerabilities/

 

[15] Alice Kender, Pikeville College: Look to the Hills. 1889-1989, Pikeville College, 1990, 5.

 

[17] Michael Hendryx. “Education and Jobs, Jobs and Education: A proposal for funding economic redevelopment in Central Appalachia,” Central Appalachian Prosperity Project, January 4, 2010.

 

[19] Nicole Simon, “Harvard professor lectures on American populism, class divide,” October 29, 2018, The Observer, accessed July 24 2020, https://ndsmcobserver.com/2018/10/harvard-professor-class-divide/  

[20] Jill Fraley, “Missionaries to the Wilderness: A History of Land, Identity and Moral Geography in Appalachia,” Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2015, Journal of Appalachian Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1/2 (Spring/Fall 2011), 28-41.

 

[21] Dwight Billings as cited in Amanda Slone,To See Ourselves: A Mixed Methods Study of the Relationship Between Place, Mindset, and Grit in Appalachian First Year College Students,” Northwest Nazarene University, 2020, 32.

 

[22] Christopher Benek, “Escapism Theology is Causing an Exodus from The Church,” Christopher Benek.com Accessed December 13, 2020, https://www.christopherbenek.com/2018/03/escapism-theology-is-causing-an-exodus-from-the-church/

[23] Ignacio Ellacuria and Jon Sobrino, Systematic Theology: Perspectives from Liberation Theology Readings from Mysterium Liberationis, Orbis, 1996, 210.

 

[24] Samuel Stennett, 1787, “On Jordan’s Stormy Banks I Stand” Hymnary.org Accessed December 13, 2020, https://hymnary.org/text/on_jordans_stormy_banks_i_stand

 

[25] Albert E. Brumley, “I’ll Fly Away” Hymnary.org Accessed December 13, 2020, https://hymnary.org/tune/ill_fly_away_brumley 

 

[26] Harry G. Lefever, “The Religion of the Poor: Escape or Creative Force?” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Sep., 1977, Vol. 16, No. 3, 225-236, Accessed December 13, 2020, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1385693.pdf?refreqid=excelsior percent3A1cb85c23e27d091a02851722030e41c9

 

[27] Alina Stefanescu, “Innocence & Violence in Appalachia: on William Woolfit’s Spring Up Everlasting,” October 7, 2020, On the Seawall: a community gallery of new writing, art, and commentary hosted by Ron Slate, Accessed December 13, 2020, https://www.ronslate.com/innocence-violence-in-appalachia-on-william-woolfits-spring-up-everlasting/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Jesus the Hillbilly and Hollering Theology in the Bible

  CHAPTER 6: HOLLERING THEOLOGY “I raise my eyes toward the mountains. Where will my help come from? My help comes from the Lord, the ma...